gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/xupdf article.rst


From: Janne V. Kujala
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/xupdf article.rst
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:39:30 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden>        03/02/13 08:39:30

Modified files:
        xupdf          : article.rst 

Log message:
        more buoys

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.79&tr2=1.80&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.79 manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.80
--- manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.79  Thu Feb 13 07:50:52 2003
+++ manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst       Thu Feb 13 08:39:30 2003
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
 
 Distortion-oriented Focus+Context views are already well-known
 [fc-fisheye]_ XXXmorerefs.
-We use a continuous fisheye distortion as a focus on large documents.
+We use a continuous fisheye distortion as a focus of large documents.
 The magnification and size of the focus is user-adjustable and
 it can me moved independent of the focus (node) in the connection structure.
 
@@ -247,44 +247,39 @@
 For the layout of the buoys, several desirable layout constraints 
 can be enumerated:
 
-    - buoys should not be placed directly on the focus 
-
-    - buoys should be placed close to their anchors
-
-    - buoys anchored closer to the focus should be larger
-
-    - the layout should animate continuously when the focus moves
+- buoys should not be placed directly on the focus 
+- buoys should be placed close to their anchors
+- buoys anchored closer to the focus should be larger
+- the view should animate continuously when the focus moves
 
 Furthermore,
-It is important to maintain orientation locally (i.e., left/right
-direction of links, etc.) but the space need not be globally
-euclidian. This matches the way the brain understands space
-as globally distorted, segmented, locally Euclidian views.
-Some refs (should search for more/better):
-http://acad88.sahs.uth.tmc.edu/research/publications/iccs2001spatial.pdf
-[wang01mindsviews]_
-http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/hunt99orientation.html
-
-That is, going in one direction should result in arriving from 
+It is important to maintain orientation locally,
+that is, going in one direction should result in arriving from 
 the opposite direction, so that the local spatial structure
 does not change too much.
+This matches the way the brain understands space
+as globally distorted, segmented, locally Euclidian views
+(see, e.g. [wang01mindsviews]_).
+
+.. http://acad88.sahs.uth.tmc.edu/research/publications/iccs2001spatial.pdf
+.. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/hunt99orientation.html
 
 Because of this, each link has a specific left-right orientation 
 so that a right-end buoy is drawn on the right side of the view
 and a left-end buoy on the left side.
 
 More than two opposing directions could also be used, but
-
-       - it is not required for maintaining the sense of direction
-
-       - it would limit the layout of a large number of buoys
-
-       - there is usually no meaningful global 2D layout of a network 
-         of nodes; in our application, the structure has simply
-         directed links, visualized as the left-right direction.
-
-The horizontal orientation is more natural than, e.g., vertial, because
-the visual field is wider than it is tall
+is is not required for the local spatial coherence and it would also 
+limit the layout of a large number of buoys.
+Furthermore, there is usually no meaningful global 2D layout for 
+a network of nodes, so the extra directions would not help much
+in perceiving the position in the global structure.
+In our application, the structure has simply directed links, 
+visualized as the left-right direction of the connection lines.
+
+As for the horizontal orientation of the link direction, 
+it is more natural than vertial, 
+because the visual field is wider than it is tall
 (as exemplified by the usual screen aspect ratios of 4:3 and 16:9) 
 leaving more space at the left and right sides than on the top and bottom.
 XXX: left and right hand???
@@ -321,7 +316,7 @@
 
    \begin{figure}
    \centering
-   \includegraphics[width=8cm]{buoyGeometry}
+   \includegraphics[width=8.45cm]{buoyGeometry}
    \caption{
    \label{figbuoygeom}
    Buoy layout geometry: XXX}  
@@ -469,7 +464,8 @@
 visual tenchiques because of several features.
 
 First, the Gzz storage model (Storm[XXX]) provides globally unique
-identities [lukka02guids]_ for the documents and structural nodes and
+identities [lukka02guids-andalso-mealling-leach-salz02-uuidnamespace]_ 
+for the documents and structural nodes and
 the xanalogical[XXX] structure implemented on Gzz is a convenient way 
 for specifying associations between parts of documents. 
 
@@ -501,7 +497,7 @@
 
 ..  UML:: xupdfStructure
     :caption: An UML diagram of the structure XXX. XXX orthogonal...
-    :width: 8cm
+    :width: 8.45cm
     :alt: figuml
 
     class xuFluidMediaUnit
@@ -638,6 +634,8 @@
 ===========================
 
 - We have presented many tecniques...
+
+- More than sum of its parts
 
 - Similar techniques have been used in static diagrams;
   we have added the continuous animation.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]