[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt

[Janne V. Kujala]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden>        03/02/28 07:37:45

Modified files:
        Paper          : exper.txt 

Log message:
        approx times

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt.diff?tr1=1.5&tr2=1.6&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt:1.5 manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt:1.6
--- manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt:1.5     Fri Feb 28 07:31:38 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt Fri Feb 28 07:37:44 2003
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
       for sizes over the threshold, the reading speed should be 
       approximately the same for both cases
       
+- test running time: 12 * 3 * 20 s = 12 minutes
+
 ISSUES:  
      - what readability/reading speed experiment literature is relevant?
      - can the reading time for that short texts be measured 
@@ -37,7 +39,7 @@
           - trust the subject to read carefully?
           - read aloud?
           - ask questions afterwards?
-     - would it be better to use different texts for three bg types?
+     - would it be better to use different texts for the three bg types?
        (i.e., is the memory effect stronger than the variation between 
        the texts)
      - is the total of 2 * 6 subjects = 12 trials for each 
@@ -74,6 +76,8 @@
       However, the subject could learn during the tests.
       Perhaps use all the 6 different orders for the 6 subjects.
 
+- test running time: 15 * 5 s + 30 * 4 s = 3.25 minutes for each subtest
+  about 10 minutes total