[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt
From: |
Janne V. Kujala |
Subject: |
[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:46:36 -0500 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/gzz
Module name: manuscripts
Changes by: Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden> 03/02/28 10:46:36
Modified files:
Paper : exper.txt
Log message:
update
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt.diff?tr1=1.8&tr2=1.9&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt:1.8 manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt:1.9
--- manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt:1.8 Fri Feb 28 08:09:38 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/exper.txt Fri Feb 28 10:46:36 2003
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
Readability test (non-disruptiveness)
-------------------------------------
-- objective: show that readablity does not suffer much
-- means: show that text size has much stronger effect on reading speed
+- hypothesis: readablity does not suffer much
+- test: show that text size has much stronger effect on reading speed
than the presence of a background texture
- 3 test cases: white background, light texture, and dark texture
@@ -60,15 +60,19 @@
for each subject?
- should the font sizes be assigned in random order to the textx
for each subject?
+ - should we use more lightness levels to find the "sweet point"
+ in the readability-recognizability trade-off.
+ Are there already such studies? It would be useful information
+ for, e.g., web design, etc.
Recognizability test
--------------------
-- objectives:
- - show that textures can be remembered
- - show that textures can be remembered better than single colors
- - compare the recognizablity of light and dark textures
+- hypotheses:
+ - textures can be remembered
+ - textures can be remembered better than single colors
+ - light textures are harder to remember than dark textures
-- procedure
+- test procedure
- 3 subtests with single color / light texture / dark texture
- learning phase: show 15 textures in series, 5 seconds each
@@ -95,6 +99,7 @@
+
SCRATCH
=======
@@ -102,27 +107,11 @@
Test cases:
-- text size: small / big
-- bg type cases: color / shapes, i.e.,
- - white
- - one color
- - full texture
- - grayscale texture (intensity scale "compressed" to a certain range)
+- grayscale texture (intensity scale "compressed" to a certain range)
XXX: small-scale fragments do lose shape features.
what to say about this
-
-Recognisability test (usefulness)
----------------------------------
-
-- objective: show that the background textures are useful
-- means: show that fragments of documents can be recognized much
- better when unique backgrounds are used
-
- - buoy view testing XXX
-
-
Suppose that the first page of each of hundreds of documents is torn into
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/02/25
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/02/25
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/02/26
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/02/26
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/02/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/02/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/02/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/02/28
- [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper exper.txt,
Janne V. Kujala <=