Re: [Gzz] Re: [Gzz-commits] gzz/doc/pegboard 1008/PEG_1008.rst 1009/PEG_100...

[Benja Fallenstein]

Benja Fallenstein wrote:

> Tuomas Lukka wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 07:22:37PM +0200, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, since I have explained my opinion (have I?) and you have made up 
> > > your mind, I guess I should just step back and leave this to you, 
> > > because there is no reason in endlessly repeating the same 
> > > arguments. Right?
> >
> >
> > I'd really like you to understand the way I propose to take care of 
> > this;
> > it's technically quite nice.
>
>
> Well, I don't think you can convince me of this. All the details I 
> have heard (scaling undefined in the general case, line widths aren't 
> scaled, width and height are supposed to be determined by scale...) 
> make me feel that no matter what's at the core, there are so many 
> layers of inconsistency layered on top of it that the API will be 
> conceptually tangled and because of that, difficult to use. That's 
> just my opinion, but that perception is why I think it's better if I 
> simply opt out of this.


Looking at it from another angle, the best way to convince me of how 
good your approach is to refactor the view API using it until only truly 
nice and clean interfaces and implementations are left ;-)

- Benja