Re: [Gzz] PEG 201 issues

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> 
> From PEG 201:
> 
>    At some point after this, the architect (tjl) will make a decision
>    to either accept, force revision, declare rejected, or declare
>    irrelevant (e.g. other PEGs superceded the current one). No-one
>    else may change the status of the PEGs to any of these categories.
> 
> Authors should be able to withdraw their PEGs or declare them irrelevant 
> themselves. This should be possible even if the PEG is not current yet 
> (I have to finish a PEG before it can be declared irrelevant? wtf?)

Whooooops.... Yes, absolutely correct. Feel free to insert appropriate
language into 201.

Would do it myself but still recovering a little from the birth; he's now
here at home, and was born on monday, 3630g, 51.5cm.

        Tuomas