[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Health-dev] From medical to health : Task 11360 completed
From: |
Cédric Krier |
Subject: |
Re: [Health-dev] From medical to health : Task 11360 completed |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:00:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On 15/09/11 12:24 -0300, Luis Falcon wrote:
> >
> > If I take the module health_pediatrics, any Models have "pediatric" in his
> > name. How can a developer find that 'gnuhealth.newborn' comes from this
> > module?
> >
>
> You just put the perfect example of why I didn't use "health" as the prefix,
> as you suggested.
>
> health.newborn would be extremely unspecific. It can even be confused with
> the health of the newborn... but when using gnuhealth.newborn, we refer to
> the object itself. Quite clear.
For me both has no meaning.
I would name the Model "pediatric.newborn" and the module "pediatric".
But this schema will require I think to split more modules etc.
Any way, this is just my vision.
--
Cédric Krier
B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: address@hidden
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpxXvkmgNrpL.pgp
Description: PGP signature