[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-bash] Differences in heredocs between process substitution and
|
From: |
Chet Ramey |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Help-bash] Differences in heredocs between process substitution and shell substitution |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:42:26 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 7/18/14, 9:41 PM, Philipp Schrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for help in understanding why the following two pieces of
> behave differently. I apologize for the lengthy e-mail. I tried to make my
> examples as short as I could.
This came up last month. The gist of the issue is that the changes to
parse command substitutions using recursive calls to the parser need to
be applied to parsing process substitutions as well.
I have attached a patch that should apply cleanly to bash-4.3.18 and fix
the expansion issue.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU address@hidden http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
proc-subst-parse.patch
Description: Text Data