|
| From: | Chet Ramey |
| Subject: | Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:05:18 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 |
On 4/15/21 6:40 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 4/15/21 6:26 PM, Christopher Dimech wrote:I usually advise having various implementations, allowing developers to switch to another available call, rather than giving only the most rudimentary implementation (i.e. more than simply posix and nothing else).If you're in need of a simple, easy to install seq implementation, you could check out https://github.com/phy1729/seq
There is a bash loadable builtin.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |