[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers
|
From: |
Eli Schwartz |
|
Subject: |
Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:40:14 -0400 |
On 4/15/21 6:26 PM, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> I usually advise having various implementations, allowing developers to
> switch to another available call, rather than giving only the most rudimentary
> implementation (i.e. more than simply posix and nothing else).
If you're in need of a simple, easy to install seq implementation, you
could check out https://github.com/phy1729/seq
--
Eli Schwartz
Arch Linux Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, (continued)
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Eli Schwartz, 2021/04/15
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Dennis Williamson, 2021/04/15
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Eli Schwartz, 2021/04/15
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Dennis Williamson, 2021/04/15
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Eli Schwartz, 2021/04/15
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Christopher Dimech, 2021/04/15
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers,
Eli Schwartz <=
- Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Chet Ramey, 2021/04/15
Re: case statement with non-consecutive numbers, Reuti, 2021/04/15