Re: (no subject)

[Chris (Ducky) Chapin]

There's a number of features I'd like seen, but I was waiting for cfengine
to stabalize somewhat before proceeding.

The patch I submitted was for 2.0.3, just as the first 2.0.4 release
candidate was posted, and therefor wouldn't make it into the next official
release and was now written against old code base.  That's why I'm waiting
=)

-Ducky
--

 Christopher 'Ducky' Chapin                        ducky@qualcomm.com
 Unix Systems Administrator - Qualcomm, Inc.           (858) 651-5433
 IT Host Services - AE-209F                                 

On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 Thomas.Lemm@gmx.de wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> I am very interested in an enhancement proposed some time ago by Paul
> Paradise on 08/09/02. I would like to see a better module driven macro and 
> class
> definition in cfengine. As up to now classes and macros (variables) being
> defined in the control: section are better integrated than those defined by
> modules. (See my example posted in bug-cfengine). There seems to be a patch
> somewhere for pre control section module execution. 
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thomas
> 
> Quote from Paul Paradies on 08/09/02:
> > Chris Chapin (whom I work with here, and has also posted - consult the
> > archive) has written a patch (submitted to Mark, I believe) that adds
> > a modules: top-level directive that parses the modules in time to make
> > them work without using AddInstallable. We felt it was a bug that
> > modules didn't appear in time for imports and the like, tweaked the
> > execution order to allow something like ...
> 
> 
> -- 
> GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
> http://www.gmx.net
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help-cfengine mailing list
> Help-cfengine@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
>