help-cfengine
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: getloadavg problem


From: skaar
Subject: Re: getloadavg problem
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:24:48 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

the same will be the case for HPUX, which also lacks the getloadavg
function.

I've not done anything with it, but an option is to use 'getloadavg.c'
from GNU/make. Autoconf has macro for this:

AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG

/skaar

* Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no (Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no) [030219 16:53]:
> 
> 1) Get the latest sources from the developers page
> 2) comment out the function in the code
> 3) ignore cfenvd (only place where it occurs)
> 
> M
> 
> On 19 Feb, mark-thompson@t-online.de wrote:
> > I would love to upgrade to 2.0.5, but I have the same getloadavg()
> > problem on solaris 2.6 that an earlier post had.  This function does
> > not seem to exist on solaris 2.6.  Is there some work around to compile
> > cfengine2.0.5 on solaris 2.6?
> > 
> > Any news on when the pdf docs will be updated?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Mark
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Help-cfengine mailing list
> > Help-cfengine@gnu.org
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
> 
> 
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Work: +47 22453272            Email:  Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
> Fax : +47 22453205            WWW  :  http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help-cfengine mailing list
> Help-cfengine@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

-- 
/skaar

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----- skaar@aol.net                     kent skaar ----------------+
+----- internet services: infrastructure & security ----------------+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]