Re: Stumped on editfiles problem

[Mark . Burgess]

The main reason for not "just going ahead and doing this" is that there
are sometimes conflixt between different regex packages that cause
neither of them to work, and lots og segmentation faults.

I do not know about the PCRE, but I think it sound like something
we should look into. Do you have a link to it?

M

On 26 Aug, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Mark Burgess wrote:
>> My point is that cfengine does not implement the regexs. That is a
>> function of your operating system. The "POSIX" regular expressions are
>> implemented in several versions by different manufacturers. It is not
>> really surprising that they do not always agree or work similarly.
> 
> Ouch. All of a sudden some of the problems I had with regexp and
> cfengine also make sense.
> 
>> The documentation describes what I believe is the correct for posix
>> regexs and refers most specifically to the GNU rx library, if I
>> recall. I do not know why you are having trouble. I only know that I
>> have often had inexplicable trouble myself on several occasions with
>> regexs.
> 
> In view of this, having support for the PCRE library would be a very
> good thing, I feel. It would make the tool consistent across platforms
> as well as providing a good, fairly well known regexp implementation.
> 
> Alternately, using the GNU rx library on all platforms would be good,
> since that would have the same effect, even if it is not quite such a
> nice engine...
> 
>      Daniel
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272            Email:  Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205            WWW  :  http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~