[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#5996: [PATCH] base64: always treat input in binary mode
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: bug#5996: [PATCH] base64: always treat input in binary mode |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:11:04 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
[migrating to help-debbugs]
On 04/22/2010 11:00 AM, Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The following message got resent to bug-gnu-emacs rather than
> bug-coreutils, because debbugs got confused.
>
> We can discuss the reasons on help-debbugs if anyone is interested.
> (Short answer: it looks like the mail you sent had two separate To:
> headers, and a changed Subject: header with no bug number, both of
> which confused debbugs. It may be possible to improve this a bit.)
The cause of the dual To: was that I had configured 'git send-email' to
autosend to bug-coreutils, then manually added another --to option to
keep 5996@ in the loop. Sending to bug-coreutils is good for fresh
patch series, but not so good when trying to send a patch in threaded
reply to an existing bug report, so I have since changed my git
configuration to no longer have an automatic sendemail.to entry.
Unfortunately, since I sent that mail with 'git send-email' and did not
bcc myself, and am not subscribed to bug-gnu-emacs, I didn't see the
actual headers that git ended up using; your email was the first I saw
of what I posted. I know I changed the subject line as a result of
sending from git, but did I even get the bug number in the subject line,
or is that something that I will have to remember to do manually?
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: bug#5996: [PATCH] base64: always treat input in binary mode,
Eric Blake <=