Re: flex and non-standard architectures

[John W. Millaway]

> for very old versions of flex. My first reaction is to remove all
> these things and let new information crop up as people write it
> in. Does this strike anyone as a bad idea? Why?

I vote to remove it. A modification that makes your job easier, and the
distribution cleaner is a clear win. The misc/ stuff was included before flex
had the advantage of autotools, correct?

Also, the tests/ directory does not need to be included in 'make dist', since
it is really a developer test suite. It should remain in the source tree,
though.

-John



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/