[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released
From: |
John Millaway |
Subject: |
Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:49:00 -0500 (EST) |
> Unless I'm mistaken, *exact* sizes aren't necessary; what is needed is
> assurance that a particular type is sufficiently large to hold some
> number (state number, source code line number, etc.).
We need at-least types for the tables. We would like exact types for
the serialiation/deserialization code, but we can manage without them.
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, (continued)
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/23
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, John Millaway, 2002/11/23
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/23
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, John Millaway, 2002/11/23
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released,
John Millaway <=
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/25
- C99 integer types, John Millaway, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/11/25
- Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/11/25