Re: flex beta 2.5.23 released

[Bruce Lilly]

W. L. Estes wrote:
> On Monday, 25 November 2002,12:49 -0500, Bruce Lilly wrote:

> > Unfortunately that's not correct (at least for 2.5.23); each .c file
> > generated by fles 2.5.23 might or might not require a macro definition
> > (and that's what configuration is) to compile on each system on which the
> > flex-generated lexical analyzer will be built.
>
>
> Ah, that sounds like a bug. I'll see what I can do.

Confirmed that this issue persists in 2.5.24 (in fact,
there don't seem to be any significant or relevant
changes to skel.c, which is where the whole FLEX_NEED...
stuff comes from).