[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version]
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version] |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2003 10:41:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Mackenzie<none@example.invalid> writes:
> A question from a "newbie": What was so special about GNU Emacs 19.34?
> Why did it become (and stay) so popular? You've indicated that there
> were versions 19.xx for xx > 34. There are Info files which refer
> specifically to 19.34 (well, at least one that does). Books (well, at
> least one book) say "The examples in this book ... were tested in GNU
> Emacs version 19.34 ...".
No, AFAIK 19.34 was the last 19 version. That probably explains the
popularity :-)
--
This line is not blank.
Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Niels Freimann, 2003/05/02
Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Luis Fernandes, 2003/05/02
Message not available
Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Luis Fernandes, 2003/05/07
- Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Brian Masinick, 2003/05/09
- Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version], Alan Mackenzie, 2003/05/12
- Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version],
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version], Edward O'Connor, 2003/05/12
- Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version], Brian Masinick, 2003/05/12
- Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version], Henrik Enberg, 2003/05/12
- Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version], Brian Masinick, 2003/05/12
- Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version], David Madore, 2003/05/12
- Re: Why 19.34? [Oldest running Emacs version], Dave Pearson, 2003/05/14
Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Patrick Scheible, 2003/05/15
Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Massimiliano Mirra - bard, 2003/05/10
Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Niels Freimann, 2003/05/04
Re: Oldest running Emacs version, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/04