[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simple editor required
From: |
kgold |
Subject: |
Re: simple editor required |
Date: |
3 Jun 2003 18:22:11 GMT |
Probably won't convince you, but ...
I consider the programming modes one of the 2 most "must have"
features.
Actually, emacs' "weird ideas of what C code should look
like" is whatever you want. There are about 1/2 dozen basic modes,
with different bracket and indent styles. From there, it's simple to
customize to whatever you think emacs should look like.
And you also get
- source code coloring
- indexes of functions
- automatic indentation, however you like it
- expansion of macros
- keystrokes to comment and uncomment code
With your "basic text editor", how would you even run a spell checker
on your code without getting false hits on every variable name?
"Paul Edwards" <kerravon@nosppaam.w3.to> writes:
> I'm after basic editting functions, rather than by default being
> launched into its weird ideas of what C code should look like (which
> is probably a style used by less than 10% of C programmers).
--
--
Ken Goldman kgold@watson.ibm.com 914-784-7646
RE: simple editor required, Dmitri . Minaev, 2003/06/03
Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/03
Re: simple editor required, Peter Lee, 2003/06/03
Re: simple editor required, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/06/03
Re: simple editor required,
kgold <=
Re: simple editor required, Jon Kåre Hellan, 2003/06/03
Re: simple editor required, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/05
- Re: simple editor required, Paul Edwards, 2003/06/06
- Re: simple editor required, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/06
- Re: simple editor required, Harry Putnam, 2003/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: simple editor required, Peter Lee, 2003/06/06
- Re: simple editor required, Harry Putnam, 2003/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: simple editor required, Peter Lee, 2003/06/06
Re: simple editor required, David Masterson, 2003/06/09
Re: simple editor required, kgold, 2003/06/11