|
From: | Subhankar Chatterjee |
Subject: | Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term" |
Date: | 10 Jun 2003 00:42:28 +0530 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Hello, J Krugman <jill_krugman@yahoo.com> writes: > It seems to me that "M-x term" is in every way superior to "M-x > shell". What's the point of the latter? Try the Emacs shell or [M-x eshell] > -Jill Regards -Subhankar -- blue pill or red pill --
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |