[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnus: mark-expirable vs. delete
From: |
Johan Bockgård |
Subject: |
Re: Gnus: mark-expirable vs. delete |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:45:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (usg-unix-v) |
"Joe Casadonte" <jcasadonte@northbound-train.com> writes:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Kai Großjohann wrote:
>
>> There has been some talk in the past couple of weeks. Not sure
>> whether that addresses your problem, or a related but distinct
>> problem. You'd find the new stuff in CVS.
>
> Thanks, Kai. Can I access archives of the discussion, to see if it
> is what I'm looking for? Thanks again!
It's in gnus.ding at news.gnus.org (or google groups). I think this is
the start of said discussion:
From: Hanak David <dhanak@inf.bme.hu>
Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Subject: emacs.gnus
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 15:04:33 +0200
Message-ID: <m2wufwoh3y.fsf@maui.hanak.hu>
I find it annoying that Gnus cannot determine the exact article
count for nnml groups. Since I often move messages from one group
to another, or expire articles, the active range is full of holes.
Therefore, when I ask Gnus for, say, 50 articles, it might happen
that I only get 5. And the estimate for the number of artciles can
also become very wild.
I've hacked this for myself quite a while ago, but very recently
I've joined the Gnus newsgroups, and decided to send a patch that
would solve the problem for others, too. The patches are up to
date, they are based on the CVS version. Please feel free to
modify them. [...]
--
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the
day they start making vacuum cleaners. -- Ernst Jan Plugge
Re: Gnus: mark-expirable vs. delete, Burton Samograd, 2003/06/13