[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x v g going further back in time?
From: |
Benjamin Rutt |
Subject: |
Re: C-x v g going further back in time? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 19:38:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> In case you didn't notice it on the emacs-devel mailing list,
>> something similar to the first of your two wishes has now been
>> implemented in CVS emacs, using the 'L' and 'D' keys for log and diff,
>> respectively.
>
> Yes, this is becoming really neat. And since this is like a magic lantern,
> I'll just make another wish: that the new `L' key only calls `cvs log' if
> the *vc* buffer doesn't already contain the proper log info: this way you
> can repeatedly do `L' without each time having to wait the minute-or-so it
> takes to get the complete log info.
My first cut at your feature request didn't go so well; it's tough for
two reasons:
1) the *vc* buffer is used both for 'C-x v l' and also when you do
'C-x v v' to commit a file, so it might contain either info that
your commit was successful, or the actual log info...would it be OK
to change 'C-x v l' to write to something other than the *vc*
buffer, say the *vc-commit-history* buffer?
2) cache coherency problem. What if the log info is updated b/c of
new commits? Do you always want the outdated log info?
Any comments on these issues? Thanks,
--
Benjamin
- C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Andrew Taylor, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/20
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/20
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?,
Benjamin Rutt <=
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/11