[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the state of the art for mail?
From: |
Tim X |
Subject: |
Re: What's the state of the art for mail? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:36:27 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Fineman <jcf@TheWorld.com> writes:
Joe> Mike Irwin <mdi@pobox.com> writes:
>> There's nothing better than Gnus.
Joe> Switching from nn to Gnus improved my quality of life greatly.
Joe> However, I consider it a serious defect that it does not allow
Joe> one to examine mail (at least the sender & subject) before
Joe> downloading it. -- --- Joe Fineman jcf@TheWorld.com
Joe> ||: Deficient contact with reality is called mania. Excessive
Joe> :|| ||: contact with reality is called depression. :||
I really like VM for e-mail.
Tim
--
Tim Cross
The e-mail address on this message is FALSE (obviously!). My real e-mail is
to a company in Australia called rapttech and my login is tcross - if you
really need to send mail, you should be able to work it out!
- What's the state of the art for mail?, kj, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Mike Irwin, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Bill Wohler, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, kj, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Tassilo Horn, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Xavier Maillard, 2004/06/29