[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the state of the art for mail?
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: What's the state of the art for mail? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:36:33 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
kj <socyl@987jk.com> writes:
> From what I've seen so far, it is (gnearly) gnunanimous. Here we
> go Gnus. Thank you all!
p.s. I actually use gnus for voluminous mailing lists. I use MH-E for
everything else. I also set mail-user-agent and
message-mail-user-agent to mh-e-user-agent so that I can use MH-E to
compose drafts in gnus.
I'll wager that if you try the indexed text searches in MH-E, you'll
be sold.
--
Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
- What's the state of the art for mail?, kj, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Mike Irwin, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Bill Wohler, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, kj, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?,
Bill Wohler <=
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Tassilo Horn, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Xavier Maillard, 2004/06/29