help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Q on minibuffer-message


From: Drew Adams
Subject: RE: Q on minibuffer-message
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:08:56 -0800

    As far as I can see it is a bug, at least in CVS Emacs.
    `minibuffer-message' uses temp_echo_area_glyphs in minibuf.c and that
    function calls

      Fsit_for (make_number (2), Qnil, Qnil);

    which just sits for 2 seconds.

    BTW `minibuffer-message' puts the string at the end of the current
    buffer which is not necessarily the minibuffer. Is not that a bug too?

I don't know if those observations indicate bugs, and I'm not sure they're
related to my question. I'd just like to know how to inhibit or cancel the
2-second delay. I don't understand this enough to know if it is the presence
of bugs that prevents me from doing that. I'd like some input on what might
work (modulo bugs).

----
    Drew Adams wrote:
    > I have a command `foo' that calls `minibuffer-message' at
    various points.
    >
    > I want to call this function from another command, `bar', but
    I don't want
    > the `minibuffer-message' display to wait for two seconds - I
    even don't care
    > if it is displayed at all in this case.
    >
    > I could change the definition of command `foo', to pass it a
    flag to not
    > call `minibuffer-message' (or to call it only when the
    command is called
    > interactively), but I'd rather not have to resort to that.
    >
    > `minibuffer-message' displays its message for two seconds,
    unless an input
    > event is received during this time. My question is: How can I
    inhibit the
    > 2-second wait? Is there, for example, some way I can simulate an input
    > event? Or is there a simpler, cleaner way?
    >
    > In command `bar', just after calling `foo', I tried (sit-for 0), to no
    > avail. I tried adding a fake event (e.g. a character) to
    > `unread-command-events', to no avail. I tried binding
    > `minibuffer-message-timeout' (to nil and to 0), to no avail
    (it seemed to
    > have no effect).
    >
    > Anyone have a suggestion?
    >







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]