[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q on minibuffer-message
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Q on minibuffer-message |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:46:20 -0500 |
In that case, what I suggest is that you set up foo with an optional
argument that is provided as t when it is called interactively. And
foo should only display its messages when that argument is t.
That's just what I wanted to avoid having to do.
That's the right method, so I'm not interested in helping people avoid
it.
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, (continued)
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Lennart Borgman, 2006/01/20
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/20
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/22
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/22
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/22
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Ian Zimmerman, 2006/01/23
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/23
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message,
Richard M. Stallman <=
Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/20