[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu vs. xemacs
From: |
Leo |
Subject: |
Re: gnu vs. xemacs |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:12:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus v5.11, Emacs/23.0.0.4 (20061218), Fedora 6 gnu/linux |
* Tim X. (2006-12-29 10:53 +1100) said:
^^^^^^
[...]
> Perhaps your right - I guess what got to me was the fact the
> respondent was able to take the time to correct a common error which
> nearly everyone is guilty of, but failed to actually address the OPs
> question in any way. I mean, is he going to correct every post that
> refers to just Linux rather than GNU/Linux?
In every emacs-* mailing lists, it has been extremely consistent to
use Linux and GNU/Linux i.e. Linux means the kernel and GNU/Linux is
the operating system that contains a Linux kernel.
Making effort to preserve this consistence should be appreciated.
--
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
- gnu vs. xemacs, H., 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Peter Dyballa, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Sven Bretfeld, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ramprasad, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs,
Leo <=
- "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), B. Smith-Mannschott, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Micha Feigin, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Alexey Pustyntsev, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2006/12/29
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/30
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Hadron Quark, 2006/12/29
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ralf Angeli, 2006/12/29
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, David Kastrup, 2006/12/27