|
From: | Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: | Re: help system question |
Date: | Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:17:58 -0700 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) |
Robert Thorpe wrote:
Eli Zaretskii wrote:From: "Robert Thorpe" <rthorpe@realworldtech.com> Date: 31 Dec 2006 13:00:58 -0800 Lots of people seem to have versions of Emacs 22 themselves, and don't seem to know that it hasn't been officially released. So people might think there is little difference between the Emacs22 they have and the finished one called 22.1. So, it might be a good idea to give the new version a higher version number.I don't see a problem here (or misunderstand you): the current Emacs 22 versions are numbered 22.0.NN, so when 22.1 is released, they will know it's newer.Yes, but the implication is that it's only 0.5 of a version number newer. That doesn't indicate that the official v22.1 should be significantly more bug tested than 22.0.NN ones were.
That's exactly what it indicates: the 22.0.NN versions are pretest versions (the most recent NN is 92), and 22.1 will be available when the release criteria are met. -- Kevin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |