[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About elisp, Lossing data after sort
From: |
htbest2000 |
Subject: |
Re: About elisp, Lossing data after sort |
Date: |
15 Mar 2007 06:07:46 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Mar 14, 4:48 pm, Pascal Bourguignon <p...@informatimago.com> wrote:
> "htbest2000" <htbest2...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mar 14, 12:39 pm, Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >> In article <1173837100.827152.92...@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> >> "htbest2000" <htbest2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > (sort list '<)
>
> >> Change that to:
>
> >> (setq list (sort list '<))
>
> > Thanks in advance!
>
> Too late!
>
> But do you understand why you should use (setq list (sort list '<))
> instead of merely (sort list '<)?
>
> --
> __Pascal Bourguignon__http://www.informatimago.comhttp://pjb.ogamita.org
I'm sorry for my post repeatly. I am using google to post on
internet-bar( low speed ), not tin likes clients.
There something wrong in function `random-list', right? I think
the key is: (setq list (cons (random n) list)). But I don't know
why.
Would you(or others) give an reasonable explanation? Thanks