[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why emacs have not native language menu
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: Why emacs have not native language menu |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:42:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> writes:
>
>> Jean-Christophe Helary <fusion@mx6.tiki.ne.jp> writes:
>>> [...]
>>> That is a possibility but obviously there are much more Japanese or
>>> French people who use their software now than then.
>>
>> Yes, applications.
>>
>>
>>> What good is a software package if it can't be used by
>>> linguistically challenged people ?
>>
>> Linguistically challenged people just cannot program.
>
> Interestingly, pretty much the only people I know without computing,
> mathematics or science backgrounds that developed admirable mastery
> with Emacs or TeX were proficient in the classics.
>
> And if you have read classical Greek, with its 3 modes, 7 tenses, 3
> numeri, 3 voices, and its complex grammatical structure that has no
> problems spreading some unsuspecting sentence across several pages, a
> sentence which, not entirely unlike a delicate spring, to a river of
> sense swilling and into a sea expelling itself, from a slow start to a
> furious - Odysseus in his ire would have been no less intimidating -
> end continously waxing will finally, after a long, but yet not to be
> compared to those of the masters who can express sentiments like "you
> two should then have started to be a little ashamed of yourself" in a
> single word by choosing all the grammatical details appropriately,
> climax come to an end which, had you not been carefully nesting and
> unnesting the twines of the silkily woven threads of language not
> unlike a stack of bee hives or perhaps the playcards of a master,
> might have been unexpected or at least no longer fathomable.
Yep. That said, it's still advised to keep your functions within one
screen. That is, 80x25, which you've done, so no problem.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
Nobody can fix the economy. Nobody can be trusted with their finger
on the button. Nobody's perfect. VOTE FOR NOBODY.
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Giorgos Keramidas, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/27
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, David Kastrup, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Pascal Bourguignon, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, David Kastrup, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu,
Pascal Bourguignon <=
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Hadron, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Pascal Bourguignon, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Ilya Zakharevich, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Stefan Monnier, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Peter Dyballa, 2007/07/25
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Ilya Zakharevich, 2007/07/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Peter Dyballa, 2007/07/25
Message not available