[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: funcallable-p?
|
From: |
Daniel Jensen |
|
Subject: |
Re: funcallable-p? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:53:11 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> I mispoke about macros. I really meant special forms. `functionp' doesn't
> distinguish between functions and special forms, right? If so, is there an
> idiom or convention for such a test, of shall I just test `functionp' and
> not a member of the list of special forms?
You can use `subr-arity' to test for a special form.
- funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/25
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/26
- RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/26
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/27
- RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/27
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/27
- RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/27
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/27
Re: funcallable-p?,
Daniel Jensen <=
RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/26
Re: funcallable-p?, Johan Bockgård, 2007/08/26