Re: funcallable-p?

[Pascal Bourguignon]

daniel@bigwalter.net (Daniel Jensen) writes:

> "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>
>> I mispoke about macros. I really meant special forms. `functionp' doesn't
>> distinguish between functions and special forms, right? If so, is there an
>> idiom or convention for such a test, of shall I just test `functionp' and
>> not a member of the list of special forms?
>
> You can use `subr-arity' to test for a special form.

(subrp (symbol-function 'sin)) --> t

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/

This is a signature virus.  Add me to your signature and help me to live.