help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: does emacs-unicode-2 branch stop developing?


From: sTeeL
Subject: Re: does emacs-unicode-2 branch stop developing?
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:02:23 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux)

thanks!:)
hope it won't take too mush time before unicode and multi-tty 

merge togather, :)

Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@math.ntnu.no> writes:

> + sTeeL <mail.list.steel.mental@gmail.com>:
>
>> hi, all
>
>> i am using emacs-unicode-2(23.0.0.1) branch for a long time,
>> yesterday i occasionly searched on web and found a "23.0.0.50"
>> version emacs, which seems is emacs-multi-tty branch,
>
> Hmm, I didn't know they had already merged the multi-tty branch into
> the trunk.  That is good news.
>
>> and it does not include any unicode support, does emacs-unicode-2
>> branch stop developing?
>
> No, I don't think so.
>
>> And, I love emacs-multi-tty but can't find any multi-tty patch for
>> emacs-unicode-2 branch, any suggestion?
>
> Just sit tight and wait.  The intention is to merge the
> emacs-unicode-2 branch into the trunk as well, but such work is
> nontrivial so it might take a while.  And before you ask, predicting
> the timing of progress on free software is an essentially impossible
> task.  It could happen next week, or it could take another year.
> Meanwhile, I am afraid you have to choose whichever is more important
> to you:  multi-tty or native unicode.
>
> (I do not have inside information; I just happen to have been looking
> at the emacs-devel archives lately.)
>
> -- 
> * Harald Hanche-Olsen     <URL:http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/>
> - It is undesirable to believe a proposition
>   when there is no ground whatsoever for supposing it is true.
>   -- Bertrand Russell
> _______________________________________________
> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
>

-- 
=============================
sTeeL
=============================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]