[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:28:05 +0200 |
> From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
> Copyright: Copyright 2008 James Cloos
> OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:04:23 -0500
>
> |> The numbers are from left to right
>
> Another way to wor what he says is that the (so-called) Arabic digits
> are big-endian when read LTR and little-endian when read RTL, and that
> regardless of how one actually thinks of them the representation of
> integers is inherently little-endian.
Endianness has nothing to do with LTR and RTL languages.
And you are wrong saying that numbers are little-endian when read RTL,
because many RTL languages read number LTR.
- Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi, B. T. Raven, 2008/11/03
- Re: Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi, cyberkm, 2008/11/04
- RE: Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi, Bourgneuf Francois, 2008/11/04
- Re: RE: Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi, cyberkm, 2008/11/04
- RE: Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi, Bourgneuf Francois, 2008/11/04
- Re: RE: Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi, cyberkm, 2008/11/04
- Re: emacs + unicode + hebrew + bidi, Richard Riley, 2008/11/04