[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs)
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs) |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:46:32 -0800 |
> Not sure where I am picking this up from and maybe it is only
> persecution mentality, but it seems to me that in some quarters Emacs
> has been perceived to be an item of hilarity only to be seriously used
> by bearded software freedom types (judging by some recent comments I
> have seen on IRC and heard on assorted podcasts - Lugradio I'm looking
> at you), am I feeling overly persecuted or is that a sentiment others
> are also experiencing? Even among geeks we get picked on!!!
Picked on? Yes, perhaps you do have a persecution problem. ;-)
Ah yes, the jungle of peer pressure - dur, dur pour les ados.
Don't worry; it will pass.
Sounds like a compliment, to me.
But then, I'm an unshaven antique entombed in hilarity.
> helping to introduce users to Emacs,
> so it has not been all negative publicity.
We need more negative publicity. Give us more.
Keeps out the bopper tourists.
> I personally don't care if Emacs is never the most popular editor on
> the planet, but I do care that it is given a fair chance to be
> evaluated on it's merit.
Trial by fire. Emacs to the rack. Let it suffer!
It deserves NO popularity. Free Emacs from the Popularistas!
- Re: Emacs's popularity, (continued)
- Re: Emacs's popularity, William Case, 2008/12/16
- RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Drew Adams, 2008/12/15
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Lennart Borgman, 2008/12/15
- RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Drew Adams, 2008/12/15
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Lennart Borgman, 2008/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Tim X, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Jonathan Groll, 2008/12/16
- RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs),
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Sean Sieger, 2008/12/18
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), David L, 2008/12/18
- RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Drew Adams, 2008/12/18
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), David L, 2008/12/19
- RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Drew Adams, 2008/12/19
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Sean Sieger, 2008/12/18
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Tim X, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Richard Riley, 2008/12/16
- RE: Emacs's popularity (was: Distributed Maintenance for Emacs), Drew Adams, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Teemu Likonen, 2008/12/15