[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x-symbol?
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: x-symbol? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:15:47 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:00:53 +0200, m_mommer@yahoo.com (Mario S. Mommer) wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> > I believe that CDlatex mode does everything that x-symbol did and much
> > more in fact.
>
> That might well be. I didn't know about it, although i did search for
> alternatives. Thanks.
>
> > for the sugar, I don't know what to suggest for direct latex/tex code
> > but I can recommend you use org-mode for composing your text instead
> > and export to latex when required... org-mode provides the display
> > sugar you wish (and much more).
>
> Do you have any pointers? In particular regarding the display sugar. Can
> you preview the formulas to some extent?
In the org-mode manual, at least for recent versions (6.36+):
*Note (org)Top:: > *Note Markup:: > *Note Embedded LaTeX:: > Special symbols
> I have been somewhat reluctant to try to write an article in org mode,
> because it seems to me that the setups end up being very hairy and
> brittle. I have not tried it, though.
I use org-mode regularly for beamer presentations but I haven't used
it from start to finish yet for an article (mostly because *I* haven't
written an article from start to finish in a long time... that's what
PhD students are for ;-). From my experience with org-mode for
beamer, however, unless you are doing very extreme things in latex,
org-mode should work very well indeed. And especially when combined
with the org-mode specific CDlatex mode which provides for many
short-cuts for frequent latex constructions.
--
Eric S Fraga
GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29 570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D