[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem
From: |
Jim Diamond |
Subject: |
Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:15:59 -0300 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux) |
On 2012-06-25 at 20:03 ADT, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for your thoughts. Given the lack of discussion in this
>>>> thread, I get the idea I'm the only person doing anything like this.
>>> Maybe, but I'd still accept a patch that makes it easier,
>> When you say "I'd accept a patch", does that mean you are willing to
>> put such a thing in, assuming the patch is OK?
> Yes.
Great.
>> If so, how about this diff against the server.el from 24.1:
>> diff server.el.orig server.el
>> 1131c1131,1133
>> < (setq dir (command-line-normalize-file-name dir)))
>> ---
>> > (setq dir (command-line-normalize-file-name dir))
>> > (process-put proc 'emacsclient-cwd dir)
>> > )
>
> "diff -u" is a better choice for output format, but thanks.
I figured I should use another incantation of diff, but given the lack
of extensiveness, I figured that might do.
> The patch looks good, I installed it in Emacs's trunk.
Thanks very much.
>> In my tests, that does what I want. I'm not in love with the name
>> "emacsclient-cwd", so if there is something which is seen as a better
>> name, that's find with me.
> I've changed it to `server-client-directory' (the "server-" part is
> just a kind of "module name prefix").
Sounds fine.
Thanks for your help with this.
Jim
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, (continued)
Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/05
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, Jim Diamond, 2012/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/11
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, Jim Diamond, 2012/06/11
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/13
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, Jim Diamond, 2012/06/24
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/25
- Re: 24.1.50 + lexical-binding + server.el + server-visit-hook = problem,
Jim Diamond <=