[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simple Emacs for rescue or quick edits?
From: |
Hongxu Chen |
Subject: |
Re: Simple Emacs for rescue or quick edits? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:41:27 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> writes:
> Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Sometime I need quick small editor. I maintain (in ~/.bashrc):
>>
>> alias e=emacsclient -a emacs -n
>>
>> for most cases it's enough.
>>
>> But in case of rescue and EDITOR env var running Emacs is not convenient.
>
> Why wouldn't it? I use enw:
>
> $ cat > ~/bin/enw <<EOF
> #!/bin/bash
> exec emacs -q -nw "$@"
> EOF
> $ chmod 755 ~/bin/enw
> $ export EDITOR=enw
> $ export VISUAL=enw
>
>
> alias e='emacs -q -nw' # works too.
>
> for quick edits. And when I say quick, I mean quick: almost 1/4 the
> boot time of vim:
>
> [pjb@kuiper :0.0 ~]$ time echo :q |vim
> real 0m2.027s
> user 0m0.016s
> sys 0m0.008s
>
> [pjb@kuiper :0.0 ~]$ time emacs -q -nw -e 'kill-emacs'
> real 0m0.573s
> user 0m0.528s
> sys 0m0.040s
I don't believe the comparison is proper. Shouldn't be written like this?
~ > time vim -u NONE -c 'q'
vim -u NONE -c 'q' 0.01s user 0.01s system 44% cpu 0.045 total
~ > time command emacs -Q -nw -e 'kill-emacs'
command emacs -Q -nw -e 'kill-emacs' 0.11s user 0.05s system 97% cpu 0.165
total
The idea of startup time comparison is not that meaningful though. And
the best way is just what you have mentioned: keep emacs running on.
>
>
>> Any suggestions?
>
> Use emacs, always emacs.
--
Best Regards,
Hongxu Chen