[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTF for emacs
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: RTF for emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2014 00:55:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hans BKK <hansbkk@gmail.com> writes:
> Re the OP's quest for WYSIWYG in emacs, that really
> seems to go against the fundamental philosophy of
> emacs
Didn't the OP say he didn't care about batch/markup
vs. WYSIWYG? (A bit strange not to care about that, but
that's what he said.)
Come to think of it, the Emacs font locks are sort of a
bridge - if I write this in LaTeX (in latex-mode)
\subsection{the top-most, global scheduler}
In the program, there is a single scheduler at the
highest level: the top of the hierarchy. This scheduler
is called the {\em global scheduler}.
the header turns yellow, and the emphasized term turns
light green.
Without font lock it would be so uninspiring and boring
(and less efficient) to write just about anything, but
aside from that it can be used to make markup resemble
the compiled result just a bit.
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: RTF for emacs, (continued)
- Re: RTF for emacs, Hans BKK, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Joost Kremers, 2014/05/29
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/29
Re: RTF for emacs, Charles Philip Chan, 2014/05/29
Re: RTF for emacs,
Emanuel Berg <=
Message not available