[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs for Windows
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs for Windows |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:36:35 +0300 |
> From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 03:07:52 +0200
>
> E Sabof <esabof@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Last time I've tried using Emacs on Windows, finding adequate
> > replacements for Unix utilities and libraries was a problem. There
> > should be demand for a well-researched, batteries-included
> > distribution.
>
> There is. It is called cygwin.
Not something to be suggested as the first choice, since Cygwin lives
in its own Posix world, subtly incompatible with the native Windows
world. E.g., you will be unable to pass Windows d:\foo\bar file names
to Cygwin utilities, unless you install support packages to do that.
And there subtle issues with subprocess I/O.
I recommend native MinGW-compiled utilities, unless the OP wants those
for which native ports simply don't exist (e.g., those that require
the Posix 'fork' semantics).
- Emacs for Windows, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs for Windows, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs for Windows, E Sabof, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/10