Re: Emacs for Windows

[David Engster]

Eli Zaretskii writes:
> But some of them seem to be sporadically supported.  E.g., they offer
> Make 3.81, whereas GNU Make 4.1 was released a few days ago (so at
> least 3.82 and 4.0 are missing).

Yes, I guess that package needs a maintainer. But at least there is
already one to build upon.

I think that wpkg, being based on dpkg/apt, might be better technically
and from a license point of view, but I can't even browse the "Package
Explorer" on the site, so that's even more discouraging...

-David