[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs for Windows
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs for Windows |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:49:56 +0300 |
> From: David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:38:20 +0200
>
> David Engster writes:
> > avoid such problems. I lately learned that the new MSYS will even
> > deliberately break binary compatibility
>
> Erm, I meant MinGW.
Ah, that... Yes, MinGW runtime 4.x breaks binary compatibility,
although I practically begged them not to do that. It is also buggy,
which is why I won't upgrade.
- Re: Emacs for Windows, (continued)
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, David Engster, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Glenn Morris, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Grant Rettke, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs for Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/11