[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Looking for a buffer-cycling library
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Looking for a buffer-cycling library |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:01:49 +0100 |
On 2014-11-16, at 18:08, Drew Adams wrote:
>> >>> I'm looking for a buffer cycling mechanism that will ignore
>> >>> any buffer not loaded from or written to a file.
>> >>>
>> >>> Example - any buffer whose name begins with '*' would be
>> >>> "jumped over"
>> >
>> > Just my 2 cents: why not use Icicles?
>>
>> Because, AFAIU, with Icicles you still need to type `C-x b` to
>> switch buffers.
Fair enough. You are aware that you can rebind command in Emacs, right?
;-) ;-) ;-)
>> I usually don't have too many open files,
>
> I often have lots of buffers, including lots of open files.
I second that. My workflow involves seldom quitting Emacs (my current
emacs-uptime is almost 4 days, and it is so short only because my old
netbook hang on Wednesday and I had to reboot - quite often it reaches a
dozen days or so), and I almost never kill buffers - I usually just bury
them (I even have a special keybinding for that, C-u C-z C-b - see
http://mbork.pl/2014-04-04_Fast_buffer_switching_and_friends). So
cycling alone is not an option for me.
> An advantage of Icicles (and similar approaches) in this regard
> is that you can either cycle or name-match - or both. Typically,
> typing just a few chars narrows the candidate set to a few that
> you can then cycle among.
This is similar to Ido, which I'm (still) using.
> FWIW: I started down the road to cycling things with Do Re Mi.
> You can use it to cycle among various things or increment various
> things (hence the name). But in the cycling cases I have, Icicles
> generally gives better behavior, because it lets you combine
> cycling with matching (completion).
>
> One of the things I admonish new Icicles users about is this
> (in the section about cycling):
>
> Do not become a cycling drone!
Good advice!
> Cycling and filtering work hand in hand. If the set of
> candidates is small to begin with, then just cycling might be
> quick enough - that is the case if you move among a small set
> of buffers, for instance. But with Icicles you can profitably
> use cycling on even a very large set of candidates - by filtering
> the set first.
In Ido, I often use C-SPC, which takes what I've typed so far, restricts
the set of candidates to all the matches and lets my type again. This
way, I can e.g. type one part of the filename, then C-SPC, then another
part, then cycle. AFAIR, in Icicles you can do the same, with the
difference that keybindings are (probably) different, and the mechanism
is more general.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
- Re: Looking for a buffer-cycling library, (continued)
Re: Looking for a buffer-cycling library, Joost Kremers, 2014/11/15
Message not available