Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs

[Emanuel Berg]

Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:

> If you like the brighter higher contrast colors, I'd
> agree Nano looks better.
>
> The colors are easily fixed.

Yes, I know you can change the colors in Emacs :)

> If you don't like 2 lines of your screen being taken
> up by a display of shortcuts, Nano looses.

Unfortunately not.

Just because you can configure things in Emacs and
spend a lifetime doing so doesn't mean other editors
are completely unconfigurable. Try this:

    nano --nohelp --morespace

Damn! nano wins again!

-- 
underground experts united