[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntax highlighting
From: |
Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro |
Subject: |
Re: syntax highlighting |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:59:50 -0200 |
Em Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:15:40 -0700
Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> escreveu:
> Hate proposing changing it since it will break anyone who has
> followed directions.
We don't have to change the interface to fix the problem. Just
changing the dcoumentation's wording ("positive" to "non-negative")
will be enough to make it straight and won't be any breakage.
--
,= ,-_-. =. Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
((_/)o o(\_)) There is no system but GNU;
`-'(. .)`-' GNU Linux-Libre is one of its official kernels;
\_/ All software must be free as in freedom;
- Re: syntax highlighting, (continued)
- Re: syntax highlighting, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, M P, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Message not available
- Re: syntax highlighting, M P, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting,
Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro <=
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: syntax highlighting, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
- Message not available
- Re: syntax highlighting, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
Re: syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2014/11/16