Re: execute defun on reception of signal

[Thierry Volpiatto]

Rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> writes:

> On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 8:14:18 PM UTC+5:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> > Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
>> > From: Rusi 
>> > 
>> > In all fairness, I thought the question interesting and spent some 10-15 
>> > minutes
>> > searching an answer.... to no avail.
>> 
>> How did you search?  Perhaps the indexing in the manuals could be
>> improved, if you provide the details about the words and phrases you
>> tried to look up.
>
> As I said:
> | In all fairness, I thought the question interesting and spent some 10-15 
> | minutes searching an answer.... to no avail.
> | OTOH I generally find google usually gives a more pointed answer quicker 
> than
> | manually searching the docs. This may well be some kind of exception....
>
> ie I started with google (which was not useful) and didnt really try info.
> [And for some strange reason didnt look for SIGUSR but SIGINT SIGQUIT etc]
>
> However on a docs-improving note here's this little titbit:
> [On other thread]
> There was this claim "letrec is nice" or some such.
> Since I know letrec from scheme etc but never seen in elisp I was curious.
> I find:
>  describe-function tells nothing about the recursion
>  the elisp info pages (index) seems to not have it at all

With helm, assuming C-h i is bound to helm-info-at-point:

C-h i sigusr

and you have immediately 2 results.


-- 
Thierry
Get my Gnupg key:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997