Re: ERT conventions?

[Alexis]

Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:

> The former avoids code repetition and probably is (a bit) 
> faster; the latter /might/ result in better reporting.

Well, based on my experiences, it seems to me that neither would 
produce better reporting than the other. i feel the `org-vcard` 
tests aren't granular enough: multiple `should`s in the same 
function can make (and has made) it more difficult to determine 
exactly which `should` assertion is failing. So at some point, 
resources permitting, i'd like to refactor the tests to 
one-assertion-per-`ert-deftest`.

(Volunteers welcome! :-) )


Alexis.