[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 03:06:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org> writes:
> Maybe. Depends how much effort one's willing to put
> into handling her mail, relative to other things,
> and how much of that to do now, relative to later.
> To take the extreme case, what if the OP wants to
> keep the rules in both formats and keep them in
> sync? You don't recommend always editing both sides,
> do you?
Well, no, but in that scenario I don't recommend
anything except to pick one and go with it.
> If OP just wants to switch from Gnus to some Sieve
> processor for good, and has only a moderate number of
> rules, I agree with you.
"Get ready for the big surprise.
You are not you.
You are me."
"No shit."
Total Recall (1990)
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, b0ef, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Esben Stien, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/21
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Esben Stien, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, tomas, 2015/09/23
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/24
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, tomas, 2015/09/25