[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `looking-back' strange warning
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: `looking-back' strange warning |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:50:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) |
In article <mailman.176.1443721449.16064.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> > It's a feature: calling `looking-back' without LIMIT is slow, don't do
> > that. The compiler is telling you that.
>
> No, it is "warning" you that there are 2-3 "required" arguments, which is
> patently false. This is a product bug, IMO. Wrong message.
>
> Letting you know how to improve performance or avoid slow performance is
> helpful information, but it is not a "warning" - there is no danger here.
> And there is only one required argument.
The message specifically said "Warning:". How can you say it's not a
warning?
You're right that the wording could be improved, maybe it should say
that this calling sequence is deprecated.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- `looking-back' strange warning, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Message not available
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning,
Barry Margolin <=
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/08
- RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08
- Re: `looking-back' strange warning, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/08
RE: `looking-back' strange warning, Drew Adams, 2015/10/08