RE: `looking-back' strange warning

[Drew Adams]

> > 2. IMHO, this kind of information should not be presented as a warning.
> >    There is no specific danger involved, such as possible loss of data
> >    or material.
> 
> There is a clear and real danger that the code will stop working in
> a future Emacs version.

Blah.  That's what a deprecation notice is for.  It is not
what warnings are for.

And certainly not a self-proclaimed "warning" that incorrectly
and nonsensically states that "2-3" arguments are required
when only 1 is required.