Re: `looking-back' strange warning

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 01.10.2015 um 19:56 schrieb Dmitry Gutov:
> On 10/01/2015 07:00 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
>
> > Letting you know how to improve performance or avoid slow performance 
> > is helpful information, but it is not a "warning" - there is no 
> > danger here.  And there is only one required argument.
>
> It's the first step toward making the LIMIT argument non-optional.

It's a wrong warning message - and a really bad style WRT users.

BTW the intendet use case doesn't exist - as Tassilo found out.
Backward move is slow - a limit doesn't change that, while the intendet 
change would provide a burden for the programmer. Beside the change 
would break a lot of code.